Talk:Elemental weapon - Revision history

ASTARIN1: /* "Very Rare" metal ingots */ new section

2022-11-30T00:41:24Z

"Very Rare" metal ingots: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 29 November 2022
Line 81:		Line 81:
	{{com\|look}} {{tt\|troll}}: ''You see a scavenger troll. <br/>		{{com\|look}} {{tt\|troll}}: ''You see a scavenger troll. <br/>
	''It is carrying nothing! <br/>		''It is carrying nothing! <br/>

			== "Very Rare" metal ingots ==

			In Discord, #warrior-mage

			In response to:

			Kjarg — 11/14/2022 6:45 PM
			Is this (https://elanthipedia.play.net/Category:Crafting_materials#Rare_metals_2) an accurate list of what qualifies as 'very rare metal ingot' for elemental weapons?
			or is it the special metals only?

			Javac — 11/15/2022 1:05 PM
			Complete list should be:
			glaes, damite, kertig, animite, haralun, audrualm, icesteel, agonite, tomiek.

VMPHNTRD: /* Notes */ new section

2020-10-24T14:22:23Z

Notes: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 24 October 2020
Line 64:		Line 64:
	:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	::::Apologies for the confusion. Thanks for the redirect. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 20:53, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::::Apologies for the confusion. Thanks for the redirect. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 20:53, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

			== Notes ==

			(1) Creatures can steal elemental weapons - As of 62 days, 463 years AVL [24 October 2020] creatures with the ability to steal weapons, such as [[scavenger troll]]s can snatch, hold and wield an elemental weapon until it crumbles. No atmospheric message is emitted when an elmental weapon crumbles in a creature's inventory; it just vanishes. I am uncertain of the timer but guess it may be the same as when stowed in your own inventory (~45 Sec). --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 09:22, 24 October 2020 (CDT)<br/>
			*SNATCH:
			''The scavenger troll exclaims, "Gimmie dat electric nimsha!" <br/>
			''The scavenger troll reaches towards you, its claws greedily opening and closing. It grabs your nimsha and wrenches it from your hand. <br/>
			''Roundtime: 4 sec. <br/>
			*HOLD:
			{{com\|look}} {{tt\|troll}}: ''You see a scavenger troll. <br/>
			''It is carrying a phosphorescent ash grey electric nimsha.
			*WIELD:
			''Tentatively, a scavenger troll jabs a phosphorescent ash grey electric nimsha at you. You knock aside some of the nimsha with a simple steel parry stick. <br/>
			:::::[after a few attacks with the stolen weapon] <br/>
			*VANISH:
			{{com\|look}} {{tt\|troll}}: ''You see a scavenger troll. <br/>
			''It is carrying nothing! <br/>

VMPHNTRD: /* Quality Adjective */

2015-06-19T01:53:43Z

Quality Adjective

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 18 June 2015
Line 63:		Line 63:
	::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
			::::Apologies for the confusion. Thanks for the redirect. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 20:53, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

ABSOLON: /* Elemental Damage Colums */

2015-06-19T01:00:28Z

Elemental Damage Colums

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 18 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Elemental Damage Colums==		==Elemental Damage Colums==
	What's the point of including three rows of zeros in an already cramped table? [[User:ROBERTDH\|ROBERTDH]] ([[User talk:ROBERTDH\|talk]]) 23:02, 30 March 2015 (CDT)		What's the point of including three rows of zeros in an already cramped table? [[User:ROBERTDH\|ROBERTDH]] ([[User talk:ROBERTDH\|talk]]) 23:02, 30 March 2015 (CDT)
			:Responding late to this, since I thought I had but apparently didn't. I had included the three elemental damage columns at the original release, since I wasn't sure how/if elemental damage stats of the various shaped options would need to be displayed. E.g. a line for stone broadsword, another line for fiery broadsword, another for icy broadsword, etc. Since it just ended up being a 100% conversion of the highest physical stat to the relevant elemental stat, I went ahead and removed the columns a few months back.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 20:00, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

	==tier 5 weps==		==tier 5 weps==

ABSOLON: /* Quality Adjective */

2015-06-19T00:56:18Z

Quality Adjective

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 18 June 2015
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	:::Oh. The talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes or errors to page contents. The game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

ABSOLON: /* Quality Adjective */

2015-06-19T00:54:00Z

Quality Adjective

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 18 June 2015
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
			:::Oh. The talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes or errors to page contents. The game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

VMPHNTRD: /* Quality Adjective */

2015-06-18T23:40:00Z

Quality Adjective

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 18 June 2015
Line 60:		Line 60:
	Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)		Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
	:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
			::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

ABSOLON: /* Quality Adjective */

2015-06-18T06:15:38Z

Quality Adjective

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 18 June 2015
Line 59:		Line 59:

	Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)		Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
			:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

VMPHNTRD: /* Quality Adjective */ new section

2015-06-17T23:57:44Z

Quality Adjective: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 17 June 2015
Line 55:		Line 55:
	-Firekast		-Firekast
	:Done, thanks!--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 15:52, 28 March 2015 (CDT)		:Done, thanks!--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 15:52, 28 March 2015 (CDT)

			== Quality Adjective ==

			Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)

ROBERTDH at 04:02, 31 March 2015

2015-03-31T04:02:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 30 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Elemental Damage Colums==
			What's the point of including three rows of zeros in an already cramped table? [[User:ROBERTDH\|ROBERTDH]] ([[User talk:ROBERTDH\|talk]]) 23:02, 30 March 2015 (CDT)

	==tier 5 weps==		==tier 5 weps==
	I fixed and added the tier 5 weapons, some were placed incorrectly in tier 4. I'm assuming the blunts are mislabeled for the tech requirements, as there should be proficient blunt and not expert. -ashbomb		I fixed and added the tier 5 weapons, some were placed incorrectly in tier 4. I'm assuming the blunts are mislabeled for the tech requirements, as there should be proficient blunt and not expert. -ashbomb

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 18 June 2015
Line 63:		Line 63:
	::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
			::::Apologies for the confusion. Thanks for the redirect. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 20:53, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 18 June 2015
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	:::Oh. The talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes or errors to page contents. The game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:::Oh. The purpose of the talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes to or errors within page contents. The official game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 18 June 2015
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
	::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
			:::Oh. The talk pages on the wiki are not to discuss the abilities themselves, but rather to discuss changes or errors to page contents. The game forums are where you should take any suggestions for improvement to an ability, since the GMs likely will never see this page.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 19:54, 18 June 2015 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 18 June 2015
Line 60:		Line 60:
	Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)		Tier 4 and 5 weapons need a quality adjective. This should be a simple thing to add. Tier 2 already has one, crude. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:57, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
	:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)		:Unless there was an update, which I can't find announced on the boards (it's possible it's buried in a thread I haven't read yet) then there is no adjectives for any of the elemental weapons aside from 'crude' for tier 2. That's what the 'n/a' entry means in the table: not applicable. I.e. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th tier versions of each weapon are visually identical and only vary in appraisal.--[[User:ABSOLON\|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON\|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
			::Right, hence, my belief that the weapons need them. --[[User:VMPHNTRD\|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD\|talk]]) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (CDT)