Talk:Combat - Revision history

RCHIGHT: /* Weapon Maneuver Minimum RT */ new section

2016-02-03T01:23:33Z

Weapon Maneuver Minimum RT: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 2 February 2016
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I was under the impression Limb Damage was capped at "massive" 12/23? 96th barbarian dancing cobra, 59 agility, no roars used. I posted about it in the combat folder, we'll see what they say. --Healfdene Rokk 06:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)		I was under the impression Limb Damage was capped at "massive" 12/23? 96th barbarian dancing cobra, 59 agility, no roars used. I posted about it in the combat folder, we'll see what they say. --Healfdene Rokk 06:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

			== Weapon Maneuver Minimum RT ==

			Can we add a column to the weapon maneuvers (bash, chop, draw, etc.) where we can log the minimum RT. With 3.0 Kodius stated that both maneuvers and weapons (weight, suitability, balance) have minimum RTs. I'd be willing to test and provide data for this column.

2012-05-12T06:36:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 12 May 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Nicely done... anxious to see more. Have you considered adding discussion in beginners section describing 'how to attack'? I think it was the section on combat ranges, started talking about ADVANCE <target>... but leaves a beginner not knowing what next. Perhaps discussion on ATTACK? --[[User:Mendaleev\|Mendaleev]] 09:35, 1 July 2008 (CDT)		Nicely done... anxious to see more. Have you considered adding discussion in beginners section describing 'how to attack'? I think it was the section on combat ranges, started talking about ADVANCE <target>... but leaves a beginner not knowing what next. Perhaps discussion on ATTACK? --[[User:Mendaleev\|Mendaleev]] 09:35, 1 July 2008 (CDT)

			==Limb Damage==

			Noticed this tonight in Black Apes...

			''< Moving in with powerful grace, you sweep a massive reinforced haralun broadsword with a long blood channel at a black ape. A black ape attempts to dodge, moving directly into the blow.''
			''The broadsword lands an awesome (13/23) strike that tears flesh and cartilage as the right leg is ripped clean below the knee (Better order that peg leg!).''

			I was under the impression Limb Damage was capped at "massive" 12/23? 96th barbarian dancing cobra, 59 agility, no roars used. I posted about it in the combat folder, we'll see what they say. --Healfdene Rokk 06:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

2008-07-01T14:35:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 1 July 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	The shield section seems to be very opinionated and not based on objective fact. I'd suggest rewriting it be my "encyclopedia"-ish. [[User:Yamcer\|Yamcer]] 14:10, 10 May 2008 (CDT)		The shield section seems to be very opinionated and not based on objective fact. I'd suggest rewriting it be my "encyclopedia"-ish. [[User:Yamcer\|Yamcer]] 14:10, 10 May 2008 (CDT)

			==General==

			Nicely done... anxious to see more. Have you considered adding discussion in beginners section describing 'how to attack'? I think it was the section on combat ranges, started talking about ADVANCE <target>... but leaves a beginner not knowing what next. Perhaps discussion on ATTACK? --[[User:Mendaleev\|Mendaleev]] 09:35, 1 July 2008 (CDT)

2008-05-10T19:10:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 10 May 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think it ought to be moved to Appraise Command. Link if you want.		I think it ought to be moved to Appraise Command. Link if you want.
	22:55, 29 March 2008 (CDT)		22:55, 29 March 2008 (CDT)

			==Shield Section==

			The shield section seems to be very opinionated and not based on objective fact. I'd suggest rewriting it be my "encyclopedia"-ish. [[User:Yamcer\|Yamcer]] 14:10, 10 May 2008 (CDT)

2008-03-30T03:55:02Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:55, 29 March 2008
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== Weapon and Armor Appraisal Info ==

		I think it ought to be moved to Appraise Command. Link if you want.
		22:55, 29 March 2008 (CDT)

2008-03-30T03:54:26Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 29 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think the weapon and armor appraisal should be moved to the Appraise Command page. Link if you want.
	[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon]] 22:53, 29 March 2008 (CDT)

2008-03-30T03:53:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 29 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The~~ weapon and armor appraisal should be moved to the Appraise Command page. Link if you want.		I think the weapon and armor appraisal should be moved to the Appraise Command page. Link if you want.
			[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon]] 22:53, 29 March 2008 (CDT)

2008-03-30T03:53:21Z

New page: The weapon and armor appraisal should be moved to the Appraise Command page. Link if you want.

New page

The weapon and armor appraisal should be moved to the Appraise Command page. Link if you want.