Post:Redeemed Necromancers - 07/04/2020 - 03:51 - Revision history

TK-421: links

2020-07-13T16:19:22Z

links

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 13 July 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\|f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements		\|f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements
	\|c=m,d		\|c=m,d
	\|p=''>>What about Butchery? It does not currently generate Divine Outrage (intentional or not) and can be an excellent Thanatology trainer. Yes, using the parts would be bad, but I can see merit as sort of an “advanced dissection” method. Should Butchery be generating DO?''		\|p=''>>What about [[Butchery ritual\|Butchery]]? It does not currently generate Divine Outrage (intentional or not) and can be an excellent Thanatology trainer. Yes, using the parts would be bad, but I can see merit as sort of an “advanced dissection” method. Should Butchery be generating DO?''

	Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.		Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.
Line 19:		Line 19:

	GM [[Grejuva]]		GM [[Grejuva]]
	\|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen,Thanatology skill		\|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen, Thanatology skill, Butchery ritual,
	}}		}}

TK-421 at 23:08, 5 July 2020

2020-07-05T23:08:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 5 July 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	''>>Based on my reading of [[Sorcery#True_Sorcery\|the chart]] there’s no Life mixed in.''		''>>Based on my reading of [[Sorcery#True_Sorcery\|the chart]] there’s no Life mixed in.''

	Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within Anabasis, though it doesn't matter mechanically.		Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within [[Anabasis]], though it doesn't matter mechanically.

	''>>[[Anabasis]] aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash\|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''		''>>Anabasis aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash\|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''

	No. For unsullied and [[Redeemed]], Holy magic difficulty and danger are the same as other non-Arcane magic.		No. For unsullied and [[Redeemed]], Holy magic difficulty and danger are the same as other non-Arcane magic.

TK-421 at 23:07, 5 July 2020

2020-07-05T23:07:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 5 July 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.		Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.

	''>>Based on my reading of the chart there’s no Life mixed in.''		''>>Based on my reading of [[Sorcery#True_Sorcery\|the chart]] there’s no Life mixed in.''

	Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within Anabasis, though it doesn't matter mechanically.		Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within Anabasis, though it doesn't matter mechanically.

	''>>Anabasis aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash\|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''		''>>[[Anabasis]] aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash\|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''

	No. For unsullied and [[Redeemed]], Holy magic difficulty and danger are the same as other non-Arcane magic.		No. For unsullied and [[Redeemed]], Holy magic difficulty and danger are the same as other non-Arcane magic.

TK-421 at 14:31, 4 July 2020

2020-07-04T14:31:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 4 July 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:

	GM [[Grejuva]]		GM [[Grejuva]]
	\|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen,		\|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen,Thanatology skill
	}}		}}

TK-421: Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-GREJUVA |t=Redeemed Necromancers |d=07/04/2020 03:51 |n=2258 |f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements |c=m,d |p=''>>What about Butchery? I..."

2020-07-04T14:30:42Z

Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-GREJUVA |t=Redeemed Necromancers |d=07/04/2020 03:51 |n=2258 |f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements |c=m,d |p=''>>What about Butchery? I..."

New page

{{Post
|a=DR-GREJUVA
|t=Redeemed Necromancers
|d=07/04/2020 03:51
|n=2258
|f=The Necromancers / Responses to GM and Official Announcements
|c=m,d
|p=''>>What about Butchery? It does not currently generate Divine Outrage (intentional or not) and can be an excellent Thanatology trainer. Yes, using the parts would be bad, but I can see merit as sort of an “advanced dissection” method. Should Butchery be generating DO?''

Anything [[Risen]]-related will generate some DO, even if it didn't before.

''>>Based on my reading of the chart there’s no Life mixed in.''

Correct. Holy+Lunar and Holy+Elemental are both possible within Anabasis, though it doesn't matter mechanically.

''>>Anabasis aside, does the [[Sorcery#Sorcerous_Backlash|sorcerous backlash risk]] when casting Holy spells remain in the “Most Dangerous” bucket for Redeemed?''

No. For unsullied and [[Redeemed]], Holy magic difficulty and danger are the same as other non-Arcane magic.

GM [[Grejuva]]
|sub=Divine outrage, Butchery, Thanatological rituals, Sorcery, Sorcery skill, Sorcerous Backlash, Redeemed, Necromancer, Risen,
}}