https://elanthipedia.play.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Post%3ANew_Guild_-_03%2F03%2F2015_-_15%3A13 2026-07-04T19:15:37Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.39.12 https://elanthipedia.play.net/index.php?title=Post:New_Guild_-_03/03/2015_-_15:13&diff=399390&oldid=prev 2015-03-03T21:16:43Z

<p>Created page with &quot;{{Post |a=DR-ARMIFER |t=Re: New Guild |d=03/03/2015 03:13 PM CST |n=918 |f=Abilities, Skills and Magic \ Suggestions - New/Existing Guilds and Skills |c=d |p=In some conversat...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Post<br /> |a=DR-ARMIFER<br /> |t=Re: New Guild<br /> |d=03/03/2015 03:13 PM CST<br /> |n=918<br /> |f=Abilities, Skills and Magic \ Suggestions - New/Existing Guilds and Skills<br /> |c=d<br /> |p=In some conversations I&#039;ve had, I&#039;ve made a distinction between broad and deep development of {{PRel|Category:Guilds|guilds}}.&lt;br&gt;<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> In DR, we by-and-large do deep development. A guild isn&#039;t ever considered complete, and additions to the guilds are always on the table. This will continue until the Guilds/Systems team collapses into a singularity due to excess mass.&lt;br&gt;<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> In many other games you get broad development, where a profession or guild is considered complete and then you go on to the next guild.&lt;br&gt;<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> If I had the benefit of hindsight I might have early on proposed a broad model of guild development, where we &quot;tie off&quot; the loose ends of each guild and then focus on introducing new ones. But that&#039;s not how we develop, and I don&#039;t foresee a major design philosophy change like that. Because of that, while I won&#039;t say it won&#039;t ever happen again, my best prediction is we won&#039;t see another guild like the Necro guild.<br /> }}</div>

ISHARON