CARAAMON: 1 revision

2014-05-12T02:43:17Z

1 revision

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:43, 11 May 2014
(No difference)

CARAAMON: Created page with '{{Post |a=DR-SOCHARIS |t=Re: gems |d=1/7/2011 1:28:04 PM |n=17805 |f=Discussions with DragonRealms Staff and Players (1) \ Suggestions for DragonRealms (Overall) (8) |c=m |p=''>>…'

2011-01-08T00:31:26Z

Created page with '{{Post |a=DR-SOCHARIS |t=Re: gems |d=1/7/2011 1:28:04 PM |n=17805 |f=Discussions with DragonRealms Staff and Players (1) \ Suggestions for DragonRealms (Overall) (8) |c=m |p=''>>…'

New page

{{Post
|a=DR-SOCHARIS
|t=Re: gems
|d=1/7/2011 1:28:04 PM
|n=17805
|f=Discussions with DragonRealms Staff and Players (1) \ Suggestions for DragonRealms (Overall) (8)
|c=m
|p=''>>I think it is missing the fun of the old system where you were like, WOW I GOT A PEARL, or WOW I GOT A DIAMOND.''

That's fair. The {{PRel|Gems|gem}} ranges are definitely pretty wide. The issue is that there are two axes involved: Quality and size. Quality has to be present for gemcutting (which is why I changed gems over in the first place), and size of a gem obviously is important.

As far as making Cool Gem Drops, I agree - we're missing the 'wow factor' that yellow sapphires, etc used to have. It's possible that gem drop rates will tighten up a little bit in favor of higher-value gems, in which case you'll see a greater difference.

However, I should remind you that you can also {{PRel|Search command|{{tt|SEARCH}}}} a gem pouch, which will essentially look for the most valuable gem in an untied gem pouch. This was put in at the same time as the 500-gem tied limit so give people a way to find their most valuable gems without needing to appraise every gem they get.
}}

Post:Gems - 1/7/2011 - 13:28:04 - Revision history

CARAAMON: 1 revision

CARAAMON: Created page with '{{Post |a=DR-SOCHARIS |t=Re: gems |d=1/7/2011 1:28:04 PM |n=17805 |f=Discussions with DragonRealms Staff and Players (1) \ Suggestions for DragonRealms (Overall) (8) |c=m |p=''>>…'