ISHARON: Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-ARMIFER |t=Re: Defense Proficiency |d=05/19/2014 02:08 PM CDT |n=2674 |f=The Paladins \ General Discussions |c=d |p=''>>It seems like the guild is leaning towards..."

2014-06-30T21:18:42Z

Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-ARMIFER |t=Re: Defense Proficiency |d=05/19/2014 02:08 PM CDT |n=2674 |f=The Paladins \ General Discussions |c=d |p=''>>It seems like the guild is leaning towards..."

New page

{{Post
|a=DR-ARMIFER
|t=Re: Defense Proficiency
|d=05/19/2014 02:08 PM CDT
|n=2674
|f=The Paladins \ General Discussions
|c=d
|p=''>>It seems like the guild is leaning towards each {{PRel|Paladin|paladin}} having a more specific Code based upon his/her favorite, most closely held [[Immortal]] and Aspect. I wouldn't be opposed to having [[Asketi]] paladins and [[Kuniyo]] paladins debating in the streets- as long as it doesn't fracture the guild too badly. I don't foresee that as a big problem, though, honestly.'' 
 
I'm going to caveat again that this is stuff that's mutable, since it touches on explanations never presented in the game. 
 
But one reason I kind of like what is written, which does emphasize Light Aspect and generally honorable behavior for Paladins, is it's something which makes them unique. Sure, it is also within the zeitgeist of Paladiness to define them more tightly as soldiers of the gods rather than honorable peeps, but then we get back to "Okay, so what makes Paladins any different than a [[Cleric]] with worse abilities?" 
 
Thus, I like the emphasis on the {{PRel|Soul system|sanctified soul}}, which as currently written has a different origins and function than Cleric [[Devotion]]. Could it use loosening? Perhaps. Does it need to be doffed for Yet Another God Guild? Eh.
}}

Post:Defense Proficiency - 05/19/2014 - 14:08 - Revision history

ISHARON: Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-ARMIFER |t=Re: Defense Proficiency |d=05/19/2014 02:08 PM CDT |n=2674 |f=The Paladins \ General Discussions |c=d |p=''>>It seems like the guild is leaning towards..."