Category talk:Bestiary - Revision history

GEM6ICE at 23:02, 20 March 2015

2015-03-20T23:02:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 20 March 2015
Line 56:		Line 56:
	The bestiary search would be a lot more useful if it weren't searching for exact matches on skill. If I enter minimum skill A and maximum skill B into the search, I'm really looking for something I can hunt with A that will teach to B. So it should return any critter with minimum skill less than or equal to A and maximum skill greater than or equal to B.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 07:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)		The bestiary search would be a lot more useful if it weren't searching for exact matches on skill. If I enter minimum skill A and maximum skill B into the search, I'm really looking for something I can hunt with A that will teach to B. So it should return any critter with minimum skill less than or equal to A and maximum skill greater than or equal to B.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 07:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
	:There ya go. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)		:There ya go. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

			== Skill Caps ==
			It seems that creatures stop training offensive skills at a different cap than at which they stop training defensive skills. I'm noticing, for example, that bucca seem to stop training my defensives around 65, but my offensives seem to hit about 90 before not training. Are there two stats on creatures? Or maybe more, if skinning and other skills stop at different caps? [[User:GEM6ICE\|GEM6ICE]] ([[User talk:GEM6ICE\|talk]]) 18:02, 20 March 2015 (CDT)

CARAAMON: /* Bestiary Search */

2010-09-14T23:55:25Z

Bestiary Search

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 14 September 2010
Line 55:		Line 55:

	The bestiary search would be a lot more useful if it weren't searching for exact matches on skill. If I enter minimum skill A and maximum skill B into the search, I'm really looking for something I can hunt with A that will teach to B. So it should return any critter with minimum skill less than or equal to A and maximum skill greater than or equal to B.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 07:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)		The bestiary search would be a lot more useful if it weren't searching for exact matches on skill. If I enter minimum skill A and maximum skill B into the search, I'm really looking for something I can hunt with A that will teach to B. So it should return any critter with minimum skill less than or equal to A and maximum skill greater than or equal to B.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 07:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
			:There ya go. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 23:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Bestiary Search */ new section

2010-09-14T07:42:29Z

Bestiary Search: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:42, 14 September 2010
Line 51:		Line 51:

	You know what would be cool is if somebody went through the skinnable creatures in the bestiary and added numbers for when you can learn from skinning failures, not just when you start peeling pelts off of things [[User:Guaranzo\|Guaranzo]] 14:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)		You know what would be cool is if somebody went through the skinnable creatures in the bestiary and added numbers for when you can learn from skinning failures, not just when you start peeling pelts off of things [[User:Guaranzo\|Guaranzo]] 14:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

			== Bestiary Search ==

			The bestiary search would be a lot more useful if it weren't searching for exact matches on skill. If I enter minimum skill A and maximum skill B into the search, I'm really looking for something I can hunt with A that will teach to B. So it should return any critter with minimum skill less than or equal to A and maximum skill greater than or equal to B.--[[User:Antendren\|Antendren]] 07:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Maintenance script: /* Skinning */ new section

2009-11-28T14:15:55Z

Skinning: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:15, 28 November 2009
Line 47:		Line 47:
	None of them have the creature's level caps on their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]		None of them have the creature's level caps on their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]
	:It's on my list of things to do. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 28 September 2008 (CDT)		:It's on my list of things to do. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 28 September 2008 (CDT)

			== Skinning ==

			You know what would be cool is if somebody went through the skinnable creatures in the bestiary and added numbers for when you can learn from skinning failures, not just when you start peeling pelts off of things [[User:Guaranzo\|Guaranzo]] 14:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

CARAAMON at 18:00, 28 September 2008

2008-09-28T18:00:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 28 September 2008
Line 46:		Line 46:

	None of them have the creature's level caps on their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]		None of them have the creature's level caps on their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]
			:It's on my list of things to do. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 28 September 2008 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Individual creature pages */

2008-09-28T02:46:10Z

Individual creature pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 27 September 2008
Line 45:		Line 45:
	I just wanted to mention something I found frustrating with the individual creature pages (oh and you guys should install wikied).		I just wanted to mention something I found frustrating with the individual creature pages (oh and you guys should install wikied).

	None of them have the creature's ~~levels~~ ON their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]		None of them have the creature's level caps on their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]

Maintenance script: New section: Individual creature pages

2008-09-28T02:44:15Z

New section: Individual creature pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 27 September 2008
Line 40:		Line 40:
	I think our next HUGE project should be overhauling the Bestiary with the semantic mediawiki stuff. Thoughts? When we do this, I think we should try to incorporate all the bestiary templates into one template, making the page more streamlined in the process and creating a form for it. Plus, with the Semantics, we can get rid of all those extraneous categories. --[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		I think our next HUGE project should be overhauling the Bestiary with the semantic mediawiki stuff. Thoughts? When we do this, I think we should try to incorporate all the bestiary templates into one template, making the page more streamlined in the process and creating a form for it. Plus, with the Semantics, we can get rid of all those extraneous categories. --[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:I don't know if we want them ALL in one template, that might make formatting a little odd.... I'll have to think about it. But at the least, I can make a form to edit all of them at once.... at least I think I can. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 18:07, 15 August 2008 (CDT)		:I don't know if we want them ALL in one template, that might make formatting a little odd.... I'll have to think about it. But at the least, I can make a form to edit all of them at once.... at least I think I can. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 18:07, 15 August 2008 (CDT)

			== Individual creature pages ==

			I just wanted to mention something I found frustrating with the individual creature pages (oh and you guys should install wikied).

			None of them have the creature's levels ON their pages! This is really frustrating while trying to find things to hunt, in say Aesry, since I look at the Aesry creatures, but then it never tells me what levels they are. -[[User:Tea\|Tea]]

CARAAMON at 23:07, 15 August 2008

2008-08-15T23:07:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 15 August 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:

	I think our next HUGE project should be overhauling the Bestiary with the semantic mediawiki stuff. Thoughts? When we do this, I think we should try to incorporate all the bestiary templates into one template, making the page more streamlined in the process and creating a form for it. Plus, with the Semantics, we can get rid of all those extraneous categories. --[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		I think our next HUGE project should be overhauling the Bestiary with the semantic mediawiki stuff. Thoughts? When we do this, I think we should try to incorporate all the bestiary templates into one template, making the page more streamlined in the process and creating a form for it. Plus, with the Semantics, we can get rid of all those extraneous categories. --[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			:I don't know if we want them ALL in one template, that might make formatting a little odd.... I'll have to think about it. But at the least, I can make a form to edit all of them at once.... at least I think I can. -[[User:Caraamon\|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon\|talk]])</sup> 18:07, 15 August 2008 (CDT)

Maintenance script: New section: Bestiary Semantics

2008-07-30T18:00:45Z

New section: Bestiary Semantics

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 30 July 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:::The poachable category is a bit redundant anyway. As far as I've seen any creature that is not backstabable is poachable, and anything not poachable is backstabable. There may be exceptions to this rule but I've never heard of one. --[[User:Cierst\|Cierst]] ([[User talk:Crazyfoolusc\|talk]]) 05:28, 28 June 2008 (CDT)		:::The poachable category is a bit redundant anyway. As far as I've seen any creature that is not backstabable is poachable, and anything not poachable is backstabable. There may be exceptions to this rule but I've never heard of one. --[[User:Cierst\|Cierst]] ([[User talk:Crazyfoolusc\|talk]]) 05:28, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
	::::It's been awhile, but this is not always true, Humanoids are pretty much the only backstabbables, and quad's are the only poachables, with some exceptions to that rule of course.--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 16:25, 21 July 2008 (CDT)		::::It's been awhile, but this is not always true, Humanoids are pretty much the only backstabbables, and quad's are the only poachables, with some exceptions to that rule of course.--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 16:25, 21 July 2008 (CDT)

			== Bestiary Semantics ==

			I think our next HUGE project should be overhauling the Bestiary with the semantic mediawiki stuff. Thoughts? When we do this, I think we should try to incorporate all the bestiary templates into one template, making the page more streamlined in the process and creating a form for it. Plus, with the Semantics, we can get rid of all those extraneous categories. --[[User:Naeya\|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya\|talk]])</sup> 13:00, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

Maintenance script: /* Creature specific categories... */

2008-07-21T21:25:39Z

Creature specific categories...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 21 July 2008
Line 34:		Line 34:
	::I'm not suggesting removing them from the page, rather, just removing the category, they would still be listed on the "critter-at-a-glance".--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 17:49, 30 January 2008 (CST)		::I'm not suggesting removing them from the page, rather, just removing the category, they would still be listed on the "critter-at-a-glance".--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 17:49, 30 January 2008 (CST)
	:::The poachable category is a bit redundant anyway. As far as I've seen any creature that is not backstabable is poachable, and anything not poachable is backstabable. There may be exceptions to this rule but I've never heard of one. --[[User:Cierst\|Cierst]] ([[User talk:Crazyfoolusc\|talk]]) 05:28, 28 June 2008 (CDT)		:::The poachable category is a bit redundant anyway. As far as I've seen any creature that is not backstabable is poachable, and anything not poachable is backstabable. There may be exceptions to this rule but I've never heard of one. --[[User:Cierst\|Cierst]] ([[User talk:Crazyfoolusc\|talk]]) 05:28, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
			::::It's been awhile, but this is not always true, Humanoids are pretty much the only backstabbables, and quad's are the only poachables, with some exceptions to that rule of course.--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 16:25, 21 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 21 July 2008
Line 34:		Line 34:
	::I'm not suggesting removing them from the page, rather, just removing the category, they would still be listed on the "critter-at-a-glance".--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 17:49, 30 January 2008 (CST)		::I'm not suggesting removing them from the page, rather, just removing the category, they would still be listed on the "critter-at-a-glance".--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 17:49, 30 January 2008 (CST)
	:::The poachable category is a bit redundant anyway. As far as I've seen any creature that is not backstabable is poachable, and anything not poachable is backstabable. There may be exceptions to this rule but I've never heard of one. --[[User:Cierst\|Cierst]] ([[User talk:Crazyfoolusc\|talk]]) 05:28, 28 June 2008 (CDT)		:::The poachable category is a bit redundant anyway. As far as I've seen any creature that is not backstabable is poachable, and anything not poachable is backstabable. There may be exceptions to this rule but I've never heard of one. --[[User:Cierst\|Cierst]] ([[User talk:Crazyfoolusc\|talk]]) 05:28, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
			::::It's been awhile, but this is not always true, Humanoids are pretty much the only backstabbables, and quad's are the only poachables, with some exceptions to that rule of course.--[[User:Rawkus\|Rawkus]] 16:25, 21 July 2008 (CDT)